Nature Neuroscience, 13,DOI: This is very silly, because if nothing else, a piece of doctoral research ought to reduce our ignorance about something, so it MUST relate to the extant literatures. What might make the machine break.
This process enabled us to see how some findings from the mud map might fall under multiple themes, which suggested a satisfactory repetition was emerging. Share your experience in the comments section. It involves making a simple outline, which becomes more and more complex as the writing develops.
Important though this is, however, you also need to be sure to sell your research in the conclusion - so it is best not to be too negative or over-modest about your achievements at this point. Well, the best way to start in my view is just to write, but perhaps start to write without the specific purpose of the discussion chapter in mind.
For my dissertation engineeringmy specific goals were the following - and elements of this can apply over the boundaries of disciplines: Give an overview of the main original contributions: The topic you are writing about may not always require a full conclusion this is particularly the case if your work is heavily analytical or mathematical, or not very discursive.
The simplest connectivity model to consider would be that of a tonotopic input combined with locally random noisy connectivity.
So the problem of the discussion chapter is a problem of creative thinking and confidence, but there are some stylistic conventions and knowledge issues that complicate the task. Each of these subheads will have words — a page of text. What am I trying to say in my conclusion.
As in, there will always be a number of open ends, questions that remain lingering in the sideline.
The Ph factor is somewhat elusive and hard to describe, but basically it means you have to make some knowledge claims.
We put the overall aim of the thesis in the middle of the bubble and put the emergent themes in the first layer of bubbles around it: They are its point, its implications. So the problem of the discussion chapter is a problem of creative thinking and confidence, but there are some stylistic conventions and knowledge issues that complicate the task.
Today, we are looking at writing the final chapter of your dissertation, or at least, my 2 cents on that topic. You need to keep in mind that the IMRAD structure is best used to write up empirical research work the type where you collect data of some kind. While a spider diagram encourages you to see connections, a matrix forces you to think about hierarchy.
The introduction of new material is often indicative of someone who has written the introduction of the thesis a long time before they have actually worked out what they want to argue. So I suggested we try using a matrix. Wendy is in the creative arts, so her findings are not in the form of formulas and graphs.
People who do literature review chapters in their first year, for instance, and then leave them, are prime candidates for this kind of conclusion problem. Even if you do not need a full conclusion, remember that any assignment nearly always needs to be rounded off in some way and brought to an end.
No need at all. Draw up a table describing where your work is similar to others and where it differs. While the introduction starts generally and narrows down to the specific hypothesis, the discussion starts with the interpretation of the results, then moves outwards to contextualize these findings in the general field.
Wendy still has one data collection round to run so some findings are more speculative than others.
There are also likely to be some key differences in your approach when writing conclusions. We started by drawing a table like this: Be honest about the limitations of your study.
Writing a conclusion is an important part of thesis/dissertation writing. Ideally, a good conclusion should be able to provide a good picture of what the thesis is about. presented in this thesis are described. Furthermore, the strengths and limitations of this thesis are considered and suggestions for further research into higher General conclusions and discussion Therefore, the conclusion.
Conclusions for dissertations and theses When writing longer pieces of work, it is still very important to observe some of the principles mentioned previously. For instance, you will still want to ensure that your conclusion really does conclude, and does not just go off at a tangent to discuss something that is unrelated to the thesis.
presented in this thesis are described. Furthermore, the strengths and limitations of this thesis are considered and suggestions for further research into higher General conclusions and discussion Therefore, the conclusion was drawn that the results from the. Jul 03, · This video presentation focuses on writing the results, Discussion and Conclusion chapters of a Masters or PhD thesis.
DO: Provide context and explain why people should care. DON'T: Simply rehash your results. Your discussion should begin with a cogent, one-paragraph summary of the study's key findings, but then go beyond that to put the findings into context, says Stephen Hinshaw, PhD, chair of the psychology department at the University of California.Phd thesis discussion and conclusion